Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code

From: Bobby Wietzel (bmc_at_usps.com)
Date: 09/24/04 

Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:47:06 -0500

No known bugs?!

Well! I guess you've done it.. You've invented the perfect software!

Well done!

"Jonathan Pierce" <support@junglecreatures.com> wrote in message
news:MlH4d.42366$Ot3.1510@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> Please provide a specific example. We have no known outstanding bugs, and
we
> recognize many constructs in code that Reflector misses. A good example is
> our elimination of goto statements in switch cases that Reflector does not
> eliminate. There are many other examples and we look forward to discussion
> reproduceable test cases with you.
>
> Jonathan
>
> <a> wrote in message news:epKRVfZoEHA.800@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > My testing shows that original Reflector creates better code and crash
> > less as your tool .
> >
> >
> > "Jonathan Pierce" <support@junglecreatures.com> wrote in message
> > news:0zw4d.1425$mH1.1794660@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> >>
> >> "Rick" <nospam> wrote in message
> >> news:usOPQGQoEHA.3792@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >>
> >>> Your Reflector tool will cost $500 compared to the real Reflector tool
> >>> which free?
> >>
> >> Our customers prefer the decompilation capability offered by the real
> >> Decompiler.NET.
> >>
> >> Our product has many other capabilities that Reflector doesn't include,
> >> and we have many more planned. Some of our customers have requested an
> >> ability to browse assemblies simiilar to the way the class browser in
> >> Visual Studio and other decompiler tools like Reflector allow. The
prmary
> >> value in our Decompiler is it'c core decompilation capability that
> >> produces higher level and more accurate code that Reflector, so we
would
> >> also have to add our decompiler to it, and all of our other features
like
> >> our refactoring tools, and wouldn't be retaining much from it's
original
> >> value aside from it's user interface and plugin architecture. We prefer
> >> to continue to sell our products as standalone tools and soon
integrated
> >> into Visual Studio when 2005 ships.
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
    ... We have no known outstanding bugs, ... > we recognize many constructs in code that Reflector misses. ... >> My testing shows that original Reflector creates better code and crash ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Obfuscator and Decompiler
    ... Reflector is not open source. ... > justify spending more time supporting it and correcting problems with ... > wastes more time tracking down dependant bugs that don't really exist. ... > of their employers resources than the cost of purchasing a supported ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Obfuscator and Decompiler
    ... Reflector is not using ILReader anymore. ... >> justify spending more time supporting it and correcting problems with ... >> wastes more time tracking down dependant bugs that don't really exist. ... >> of their employers resources than the cost of purchasing a supported ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Obfuscator and Decompiler
    ... > Remember that you asked Lutz to charge for Reflector because it makes ... The reason I asked Lutz to charge for his tool is so that he could ... justify spending more time supporting it and correcting problems with ... wastes more time tracking down dependant bugs that don't really exist. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)
  • Re: Obfuscator and Decompiler
    ... Reflector is not a good tool, only that Decompiler.NET does a much ... I try to send bug reports to Lutz ... and other competitors when I see them so that they can improve their ... I am glad to see that Lutz is addressing the bugs on his ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)