Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code
From: Nak (a_at_a.com)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: COBOL file dump..."
- Previous message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: wap signal strength"
- In reply to: pop-server_at_nyc.rr.com: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Reply: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:45:58 +0100
Hi,
> You also make a comment admitting that you at least attempted to decompile
> our source code.
> What else did you mean by: "By the way, the codes a bit dirty!"
It was a flippant remark which went with the rest of the post.
I have *never* decompiled anything, except been shocked by how well the
Reflector plugin can get my program back to source. That is all, I have no
desire for decompilation, if you cant take a tounge in cheek attitude
towards a tounge in cheek post then you need to lighten up a little!
> We are a commercial company and will utilize legal processes as necessary
> to protect our intellectual property. You may consider this a warning
> since you have already implied that you have attempted to decompile our
> product's source code in violation of our license agreement which you
> agreed to when you downloaded and again when you installed the product.
LOL, you obviously have *no* idea of the legal system to be making
statements like that. You could not prove either way from my post regarding
the matter. HAHAHA, I have *never* even downloaded your "aplette" so how
could I decompile it? or agree to an EULA? Get a life! I have reflector and
for the purposes I need it, it's the perfect program for me. So I suggest
you calm down and stop making statements that you obviously believe are so
true, that puts you in the same ball park as me in the legal system!
> You will be one of the first suspected if any attempts are made to crack
> or distribute cracked versions of our product.
Ever heard of scandalous remarks?
> Jonathan
A) Get a life
B) Get a life
C) Shut up!
Nick.
(And may I say this is totally without prejudice!)
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: COBOL file dump..."
- Previous message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: wap signal strength"
- In reply to: pop-server_at_nyc.rr.com: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Reply: Jonathan Pierce: "Re: Decompiler.NET reverse engineers your CLS compliant code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|