Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions
From: Chris Dunaway ("dunawayc[[at]_lunchmeat_sbcglobal[dot]]net")
Date: 05/14/04
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: little help with datagrid"
- Previous message: SQL: "Forms"
- In reply to: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Next in thread: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Reply: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:08:53 -0500
On 14 May 2004 17:00:52 +0200, Herfried K. Wagner [MVP] wrote:
>
> Did you ever see that for another application? I don't see much sense
> in hiding the user the fact that the file actually contains code that
> can be executed.
Lots of apps do this. Just look at Windows Screen savers. They have a
.scr extension, but are nothing more than .dlls.
Also in Windows, control panel applets. They have an extension of .cpl but
are just a .dll.
How about PhotoShop plugins. They have different extensions (.8bf for
example), but are just .dll's
That's a very common thing to do, but I like your suggestion about the
naming, though.
The only way I can think to do it with .Net would be to use a custom build
action in a setup project that renames the file.
-- Chris To send me an E-mail, remove the "[", "]", underscores ,lunchmeat, and replace certain words in my E-Mail address.
- Next message: Cor Ligthert: "Re: little help with datagrid"
- Previous message: SQL: "Forms"
- In reply to: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Next in thread: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Reply: Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]: "Re: Compileing to diffrent file extensions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|