Re: .Net Copyright
From: Auric__ (not.my.real_at_email.address)
Date: 05/07/04
- Next message: John Q: "RE: .Net Copyright"
- Previous message: spamfurnace: ".Net Copyright"
- In reply to: spamfurnace: ".Net Copyright"
- Next in thread: David Browne: "Re: .Net Copyright"
- Reply: David Browne: "Re: .Net Copyright"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:46:42 -0700
On Fri, 7 May 2004 12:23:20 +1200, spamfurnace wrote:
>Howdy,
>
>I'm no legal beagal but from what i understand if you want to own the rights
>to an idea you need a patent. If you cant get a patent then your next best
>option is a copyright. However anyone can get around copyright simply by
>ensuring their functionality albeit the same, is produced in a slightly
>different way.
>
>Does this mean that simply rewriting C# code in VB is enough to bypass
>copyright?
>
>Thanks
>Richard
Nope - that would be a "derivative work", meaning your VB was based on
the C#, and legally belonged to the original author.
-- auric "underscore" "underscore" "at" hotmail "dot" com ***** I tried snorting coke once. I almost drowned.
- Next message: John Q: "RE: .Net Copyright"
- Previous message: spamfurnace: ".Net Copyright"
- In reply to: spamfurnace: ".Net Copyright"
- Next in thread: David Browne: "Re: .Net Copyright"
- Reply: David Browne: "Re: .Net Copyright"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|