Re: ASCII code
From: Tom Shelton (tom_at_mtogden.com)
Date: 02/12/04
- Next message: Tom Shelton: "Re: OT:"
- Previous message: Terry Williams: "Re: Bad performance in wireless Network (802.11b)"
- In reply to: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Next in thread: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Reply: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:47:16 -0800
On 2004-02-12, Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook] <Jay_Harlow_MVP@msn.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>> Interesting... I've never really tried rotor, so I wasn't sure how that
>> would work. Another place you may have trouble is with the string
>> concatenation operators (&, &=). I believe these make calls into the
>> VB.NET runtime library. So, you'll want to use String.Concat instead.
>
> I've only seen & and &= use String.Concat, I've never seen them use a VB.NET
> specific routine.
>
> However I'm not saying they don't!
>
> Jay
It doesn't... See, a long time ago - when I was first learning .NET,
I used to always remove the reference to Microsoft.VisualBasic. I don't
remember the context, but I was in a discussion once were it was
revealed to me about the automatic inclusion by the compiler. I started
playing around with using ILDASM to generate il files, removing the
reference, and then using ILASM to regenerate the assemblies. In the
process I found several situations where the compiler inserted calls to
some Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerHelper class (or something like that,
it's been a couple of years ago, so I don't remember all of the
details). I seem to remember & and &= being one of those cases, but the
OP as proven that to be mistaken... For all I know, that could have
been during the Beta or RC days, and it has since changed during release :)
-- Tom Shelton [MVP] Powered By Gentoo Linux 1.4 "Zaphod grinned two manic grins, sauntered over to the bar and bought most of it." - Zaphod in paradise.
- Next message: Tom Shelton: "Re: OT:"
- Previous message: Terry Williams: "Re: Bad performance in wireless Network (802.11b)"
- In reply to: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Next in thread: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Reply: Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]: "Re: ASCII code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|