Re: trinary statement

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

No - of course not.
It's just useful to use the common terms if you know them. For example, if
someone asked a question about 'categories', it might be confusing until you
knew that they were talking about 'classes' or 'types'.
--
David Anton
http://www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com
Convert VB to C#, C++, or Java
Convert C# to VB, C++, or Java
Convert C++ to C#, VB, or Java
Convert Java to C#, C++, or VB


"Peter Duniho" wrote:

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:14:02 -0700, David Anton
<DavidAnton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ok - I'll be a nitpicker and point out that the most-often used terms for
this are:
"ternary" operator, or "conditional" operator, or "ternary conditional"
operator.

Sure, but...

From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/trinary

tri⋅na⋅ry  [trahy-nuh-ree]

–adjective
consisting of three parts, or proceeding by three; ternary.

Is it really that bad for someone to simply use a synonym instead of the
more common term?

Pete


.

Relevant Pages