Re: ms sql server grabbing 5Gb. Is this good nomal?
- From: "sloan" <sloan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:48:50 -0400
http://glennberrysqlperformance.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!45041418ECCAA960!770.entry
Bookmark it.
The queries to find missing indexes and to find unused(bad) indexes is
invaluable.
You can also look at the Sql Server Dashboard Reports, which puts a nice GUI
onto queries (similar to the ones above).
"Raphael Gomes" <ralgomes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:559cfddd-e757-427c-a0fe-7097022c2b9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So I have a .NET site with a few rather large tables (the three main
ones at about 1 million records each). The hosting setup consists of
some Web Servers running IIS 6, being served by another box running MS
SQL Server 2005.
The web servers run smoothly enough, but even without much use (this
site has such a multi-server setup because it has spikes of use near
holidays) but the SQL Server is coughing up and dying about once a
day.
The guys at the hosting company show me the logs showing that the SQL
server is under heavy use (processor at almost +90%, 5Gb of RAM used).
I'm running SQL profiler trying to find out if there are some rogue
query causing trouble (I used linq for this project) but so far, I
haven't seen good benchmarks for sql server performance. Are these
numbers "normal" for a setup like this? (single sql server serving
multiple web servers, tables of about 1 million records each - so far
being used for simple selects, inserts and updates).
Any help would be very much appreciated,
--
Raphael Gomes
.
- References:
- ms sql server grabbing 5Gb. Is this good nomal?
- From: Raphael Gomes
- ms sql server grabbing 5Gb. Is this good nomal?
- Prev by Date: Re: more linq questions
- Next by Date: Re: Making copies inside static methods..please help!!
- Previous by thread: Re: ms sql server grabbing 5Gb. Is this good nomal?
- Next by thread: Re: Interface tutorial?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|