Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: "Peter Duniho" <NpOeStPeAdM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:05:20 -0800
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:56:24 -0800, Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Peter Duniho wrote:On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:07:59 -0800, Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Not so. [...]And yet, nothing in the remainder of your post contradicted anything I wrote,
Try and read it again.
"You can only declare a variable referencing the Hashtable as volatile.
And doing so only affects the usage of that variable,"
_YOU_ "try and read it again".
You are reading out of context. Why, I have no idea. But, the point of my post was to address the specific question, not to give a complete enumeration of everything that "volatile" does. In context, my statement was precise, to the point, and correct.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- References:
- hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: James
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: Peter Duniho
- Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- hashtable - thread safety clarification
- Prev by Date: Re: error CS0621: virtual or abstract members cannot be private
- Next by Date: Re: How to initialize a string variable to a length of 500?
- Previous by thread: Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- Next by thread: Re: hashtable - thread safety clarification
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|