Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:47:57 -0500
Pavel Minaev wrote:
On Nov 21, 11:40 am, Bob <B...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The question about IPC between managed vs unmanaged comes up once in a
while, and I generally see "Named Pipes" as the answer. But I was
wondering if there is anything new.
The app in this case will only be sharing short strings for the most
part, and the C++ part will eventually be rewritting in C#. So I'm
looking for anything that's fast and easy, but also not too ugly. Is
it still necessary to use named pipes?
Do you actually need _inter-process_ communication? If so, named pipes
are still the fastest available communication mechanism for that, and
relatively easy to use as well, no matter whether you're using C++ or
C#.
Is named pipes faster than shared memory ?
Arne
.
- References:
- Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- From: Bob
- Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- From: Pavel Minaev
- Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- Prev by Date: Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- Next by Date: Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- Previous by thread: Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- Next by thread: Re: Best IPC mechanism between managed C# and unmanaged C++
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|