Re: Encapsulation

From: harborsparrow <pgpalmer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 19:00:02 -0700 (PDT)

On May 24, 12:07 am, Jon Harrop <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have two separate classes and would like the members of one class to have
access to the private members of another class. What is the idiomatic C#
solution to this?

I believe C++ would use "friends".

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancyhttp://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u

If you let both classes inherit from a third superclass, you can use
"protected" to let them see each other's data (I think). I would not
do that, however, without documenting it prominently.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Encapsulation
  - From: Jon Harrop

References:
- Encapsulation
  - From: Jon Harrop

Prev by Date: Re: Why event handler first parameters are incorrect
Next by Date: Re: using / Add a reference then using
Previous by thread: Re: Encapsulation
Next by thread: Re: Encapsulation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: JOGL
... target market with advertising? ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.lang.java.programmer)
Re: set intersection -> true/false
... languages with pattern matching much easier to use than C++. ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.programming)
Re: shootout: implementing an interpreter for a simple procedural language Minim
... You can do that by writing a static type checker... ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.lang.functional)
Re: lazyness
... Haskell implementation you happen to choose? ... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. ...
(comp.lang.functional)
Re: A simple interpreter
... Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy ...
(comp.lang.lisp)