Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 20:12:22 -0400
Jon Harrop wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:If you look out in the real world, then you will see that
somehow people are able to write software with lots
of assemblies without the ability to have a "nested
assembly" mechanism.
Absolutely. Many of our competitors are bumbling around with enormous
Fortran 77 codebases that have no encapsulation or high-level structure at
all.
Tolerating the same deficiencies would mean commercial suicide for us.
I was talking about .NET code even though I also know about
some Fortran code.
But one size does not fit all. Maybe C# and .NET is not
suitable for your apps.
Arne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- References:
- Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Encapsulation
- Prev by Date: Re: string.Split() performant ?
- Next by Date: Re: Simple data type question. namespace name 'Address' could not be found?
- Previous by thread: Re: Encapsulation
- Next by thread: Re: Encapsulation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|