Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:27:31 +0100
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
Jon Harrop wrote:
Perhaps you mean that it is still possible to write monumental code bases
in the absence of decent encapsulation mechanisms. I cannot disagree with
that.
I assume you mean "I cannot agree" or "I disagree".
No, I meant what I said. Consider it roughly equivalent to "I agree with
that".
If you look out in the real world, then you will see that
somehow people are able to write software with lots
of assemblies without the ability to have a "nested
assembly" mechanism.
Absolutely. Many of our competitors are bumbling around with enormous
Fortran 77 codebases that have no encapsulation or high-level structure at
all.
Tolerating the same deficiencies would mean commercial suicide for us.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- References:
- Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Encapsulation
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Encapsulation
- Prev by Date: Re: Really basic C# and Visual Studio 2008 question
- Next by Date: Re: Encapsulation
- Previous by thread: Re: Encapsulation
- Next by thread: Re: Encapsulation
- Index(es):
Loading