Re: Workflow Foundation and Oracle
- From: ludwig_stuyck@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 02:11:12 -0800 (PST)
On 1 feb, 22:26, "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]"
<m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ludwig,
BizTalk does require SQL Server to run, yes.
WF doesn't necessarily require SQL Server to run, you just need it if
you want to use SQL Server as a persistence store for workflows. There is
nothing that says you have to use SQL Server to run WF.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks. If I use WF, I need that persistance store. Meanwhile I found
out that Sql Express can be used to for WF, and that's free. It's
another valid option, I believe...
.
- References:
- Re: Workflow Foundation and Oracle
- From: ludwig_stuyck
- Re: Workflow Foundation and Oracle
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: Workflow Foundation and Oracle
- Prev by Date: Re: Pass a property
- Next by Date: Re: Function minimization and random numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Workflow Foundation and Oracle
- Next by thread: Process.Start Method (ProcessStartInfo)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|