Re: which one is faster/better > or >=

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



"Michael C" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OV$jKotXIHA.5348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

"Larry Smith" <no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ok11I7OXIHA.3556@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> This type of hairsplitting won't benefit you in any way you'll ever
> notice. From a performance perspective, it's a complete waste of time
even
> thinking about it.


One thing I wanted to add was that if creating a fast algorithm then
something like this would just be one tool in the toolchest. It might
gain a
1% advantage but in combination with other optimisations it could give
real
benefits.

Michael

1% ??? It must be the most trivial algorithm of all time.
or
You meant .00001%


.

Relevant Pages