Re: Visual Studio and .Net Runtime Framework dependency

George <George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for your advice, Jon!

I think .Net 2.0 code can not run on .Net 1.1 Runtime, .Net 1.1 code can run
on both .Net 1.1 Runtime and .Net 2.0 Runtime, right?

Exactly. There are a few compatibility issues running 1.1 code on 2.0
(i.e. a few cases where the results will be different) but largely you
should be fine.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C++ typedef equivalent in C#
    ... George wrote: ... using FooBar = System.String; ... Jon Skeet - ... If replying to the group, please do not mail me too ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Unusual incompatibility between Office X for Macintosh and Office
    ... Many thanks to both you and BIll for replying, but before I posted, I ... searched the group for pointers as to any known compatibility issues. ...
    (microsoft.public.powerpoint)
  • Re: Who makes small guitars?
    ... Thanks George. ... When replying via email, replace spam with speak in the address. ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic)
  • Re: compose key
    ... > Replying to my own post - I hope it might help somebody else ... > OK I digged deeeeep into it and searched the whole 'net. ... BTW: the default ... for compatibility, as described in comments in the file). ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: 9-11
    ... That last sentence you are replying to was not written by me..... ... if I'm seeing all the posts to this thread!!! ... What I was wondering most was where the hell was George W Bush. ...
    (soc.retirement)