Re: What I don't like about C# so far, compared to C++ (managed or
- From: raylopez99 <raylopez99@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 01:09:18 -0700
tOn Aug 1, 8:02 am, Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]
<pbromb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agreed. Raised the signal to noise ratio, didn't contribute miuch content
other than more "me me".
--
Recursion: see Recursion
site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
unBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
bogMetaFinder: http://www.blogmetafinder.com
And the last, I hope. IMHO, that sort of rant has no place here,
especially given the subjective nature of many of your complaints. It's
just trolling.
You have a problem with trolling? I find trolls usually ask the best
questions myself. After all, if you know everything, there's no need
for a usenet group.
I thought this thread was interesting myself, and beats the usual post
of just solving some individual's particular bug of the moment. But
if you disagree feel free to killfile me or otherwise ignore.
BTW sorry for using some wrong terminology in the OP (meant multiple
inherietance from multiple classes, not multiple interfaces, which are
supported by C#).
RL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What I don't like about C# so far, compared to C++ (managed or
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: What I don't like about C# so far, compared to C++ (managed or
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiple Request Processor
- Next by Date: Re: Which version of Visual Studio 2005?
- Previous by thread: Re: What I don't like about C# so far, compared to C++ (managed or otherwise)
- Next by thread: Re: What I don't like about C# so far, compared to C++ (managed or
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
