Re: Version control
- From: "PS" <ecneserpegats@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:21:18 -0400
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.20dca0f5870a926122f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter Morris <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Which version control solution can you guys recommend? Requirements are
01: Must work okay over the Internet.
02: VS2005 integration, so it gets + locks files as you edit them.
I didn't spot this last bit - do you *really* need it to lock files, or
is that just what you're used to? I find the "change and merge" model
works a lot more smoothly, for all except things like project files
(and binary files, of course).
Agree, get and lock can be frustrating even in a small team, and expecially
if working remotely. Merging is the way to go.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- References:
- Version control
- From: Peter Morris
- Re: Version control
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Version control
- Prev by Date: Re: Version control
- Next by Date: Re: Require base class member to be populated by derived classes.
- Previous by thread: Re: Version control
- Next by thread: Re: Version control
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
