Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:27:07 +0100
Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh I certainly wasn't recommending doing it. Just pointing out the
difference between "never ever do this" and "it's not guaranteed to
work". It's guaranteed to work so long as no-one ever touches the code
again :)
In general it is not wise to assume that everybody that will have
to maintain the code for the next 10-20 year have memorized the
language specs.
KISS is one of the most important rules.
Absolutely - can't (and wouldn't) argue with that. I think we're all in
violent agreement there.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- References:
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Sergey Poberezovskiy
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: anonymous initializer problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Access to Path is Denied.
- Next by Date: Re: Form designer looses controls
- Previous by thread: Re: anonymous initializer problem
- Next by thread: Re: anonymous initializer problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|