Re: 'with' statement
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 15:42:08 +0100
Michael A. Covington <look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I quite agree that it would be nice to have the equivalent of
Java's "import static" in C# at some point, but I don't think that
making the maths easier is going to impact *that* many developers
compared with, say, LINQ which is likely to be useful to virtually
everyone.
What programming language do you recommend for mathematical programming in
.NET, then?
Well, I haven't tried the Fortran for .NET compilers, but they'd be an
obvious starting point. Here's one:
http://www.silverfrost.com/11/ftn95/overview.asp
It really depends on how maths-heavy the code is going to be - I'd
probably *try* it in C# and see how painful it is to start with.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- References:
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Mark Rae
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Michael A. Covington
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Michael A. Covington
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Michael A. Covington
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Michael A. Covington
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: 'with' statement
- From: Michael A. Covington
- Re: 'with' statement
- Prev by Date: Re: Complex numbers
- Next by Date: Re: synch Outlook appointments bidirectional
- Previous by thread: Re: 'with' statement
- Next by thread: Re: Inherit ComboBox / Windows Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|