How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- From: "Ronald S. Cook" <rcook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:12:56 -0600
I'm just curious how you would handle this. In the cable industry, Comcast
is referred to as an "MSO" (multiple systems operator) meaning they own many
cable systems. Therefore a solution must be architected to accommodate
"System" as an entity. This means a table in the database named System, a
class System, a web form System, etc.
Since System is such a reserved word, how should we do this? To rename it
"CableSystem" would bug as isn't consistent/what is desired (should have to
change our business terminology because conflicts with development tool).
For the class, it could be named "System" and just wrapper a namespace
around it named "Classes". But for the web form, while it could be named
System.aspx, you can't just wrap a namespace around it.
Hungarian notation is "out" these days so I'm looking for a good
standardized and consistent approach for all such names that might conflict.
Thanks,
Ron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- Prev by Date: How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- Next by Date: Re: does my stream contain valid XML?
- Previous by thread: How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- Next by thread: Re: How would you handle needed "System" class/table/form in application?
- Index(es):