Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:13:44 -0000
Simon Tamman <i_am_GETRIDOFTHISJUNKanti_everything@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I "think" he's trying to prop up existing code by re-writing this library.
If the API changes then more code needs to be re-written.
That's why I think he's not using a database.
I could be wrong though, if that's the case then you're right a database is
definately the best course of action. Because trying to create a dynamic
type in a statically typed language is like putting a square peg in a round
hole.
"Todos" isn't trying to make serious points - he's just trolling. Best
to ignore.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Todos Menos [MSFT]
- Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Simon Tamman
- Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- References:
- Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Dave Young
- Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Todos Menos [MSFT]
- Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- From: Simon Tamman
- Dictionary Object name/value pair
- Prev by Date: Re: C# / XML / WebSvc problem
- Next by Date: Re: how to spin the date (a new control in C#)
- Previous by thread: Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- Next by thread: Re: Dictionary Object name/value pair
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|