Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Barry Kelly <barry.j.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:20:20 +0000
Peter Olcott wrote:
I want to fully understand exactly how the underlying architecture works so that
I can design it from the ground up using the best means. With C++ I already know
exactly what kind of machine code that anything and everything will translate
into. I need to acquire this degree of understanding of .NET before I begin
using it.
I think learning about a system is most easily achieved *while* using
it, not *before* using it. Experimentation and experience are better
teachers than replies to questions on newsgroups.
I am not
comfortable switching to C# until I know every detail of exactly how to at least
match the performance of native code C++.
I suggest you:
1) Make a first attempt at converting some algorithm you're concerned
about to C#.
2) Profile it to find out what's slower than your budget allows.
3) Then perhaps ask specific questions on the newsgroups about how to
improve and / or redesign a particular construct / technique.
-- Barry
--
http://barrkel.blogspot.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- References:
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Barry Kelly
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Bruce Wood
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Barry Kelly
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Barry Kelly
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- Prev by Date: Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- Next by Date: Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- Previous by thread: Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- Next by thread: Re: Boxing and Unboxing ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|