Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- From: "William Stacey [C# MVP]" <william.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:29:40 -0500
I don't have perfect info as has not did an install package in a while. But
one of the dependency loaders/install loaders will put up nice dialogs for
the user to download (FX, sql express, etc) required dependencies and not
proceed until those are loaded - so you can include on CD or it will
download. There was a C9 vid on it, but don't know how to do it with VS
installer.
--
William Stacey [C# MVP]
"Tee" <khmer_lovers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23B68$AxHHHA.1240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Thanks for the reply
|
| Anyway i have to take one of the suggested as there is no other way around
| this.
|
|
|
| "sloan" <sloan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:O8uRkQwHHHA.3952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > You don't necessarily have to include it, but they have to have it.
| >
| > There's no free lunch.
| >
| > If you want to run a .Net 2.0 application, the client machine has to
have
| > the framework (2.0).
| >
| > They can either:
| >
| > 1. Have it already.
| > 2. Install it from windows update or microsoft.com
| > 3. You provide it.
| >
| > Pick your poison.
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > "-xx-" <khmer_lovers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:u9NoeKwHHHA.924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> Hi,
| >>
| >> I have an application written in C# .NET 2005 using .NET framework
v2.0,
| > the
| >> execute file is only 500KB and it used two third party DLLs, all added
| >> up
| >> to round about 1MB.
| >>
| >> My question is when i distribute my application to friends do i have to
| >> include .NET framework v2.0 as part to of the setup. I don't really
want
| > to
| >> include .NET framework v2.0 because it increases my final executable
| > install
| >> file dramatically. From 1.5MB to 25MB because the framework v2 is
22+MB.
| >>
| >> Is there anyway i can get my application running on my friends machine
| >> without installing the full version of .NET framework v2. I want the
| >> absolute mimimum because my application doesn't use much of the .net
| >> controls anyway, mostly console and back up processing.
| >>
| >> Looking forward hearing from you all.
| >>
| >> Regards
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
|
|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- From: Lance
- Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- References:
- Package and deploy in .NET
- From: -xx-
- Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- From: sloan
- Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- From: Tee
- Package and deploy in .NET
- Prev by Date: Re: update ProgressBar
- Next by Date: What's wrong with my SqlCommand?
- Previous by thread: Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- Next by thread: Re: Package and deploy in .NET
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading