Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: "Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Dec 2006 00:40:33 -0800
Jeff Louie wrote:
Gary... There are many definitions for the word type. In C# I find the
definition of a type as a named generic interface to be a useful definition. In a
nutshell a general interface is a particular set of signatures.
It strikes me as a less than useful definition when "interface" and
"generic" are already defined in C#. A definition which not only needs
more definitions in order to be useful, but those definitions are
overloads of *existing* definitions is likely to lead to confusion, I
suspect.
(I know you said to ignore the definition if it's not helpful, but I
thought it was worth pointing out how potentially confusing it is.)
Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: Jeff Louie
- Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: Mark Wilden
- Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: Dustin Campbell
- Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- References:
- Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: garyusenet
- Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- From: Jeff Louie
- Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- Prev by Date: Re: Xml over tcp/ip
- Next by Date: Re: Clipboard copy and paste
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Class Synonymous with Type?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|