Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: "Mark Wilden" <mwilden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:37:57 -0700
"Dave Sexton" <dave@jwa[remove.this]online.com> wrote in message
news:OyeO35Z6GHA.1484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
These problems, where the intention differs from the actual are usually
referred to as "bugs"
Perhaps, but the actual could be the correct behavior and the intention
could be incorrect. What defines a "bug" is the degree to which a program
delivers a result that its users don't want. At the end of the day, it is
this that must be judged, not intentions (with which the road to hell is
paved with good ones).
///ark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: Bruce Wood
- Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- References:
- Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: tjb
- Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: Bruce Wood
- Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: Mark Wilden
- Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- From: Dave Sexton
- Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- Prev by Date: Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- Next by Date: Re: Regular Expression Niggle
- Previous by thread: Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- Next by thread: Re: Repetitive XML comments -- what's the point?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|