Re: More about remoting

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance


"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]"
Remoting is dead. Unless, perhaps, you are using the IPC channel in .net
2.0
Just my 2 cents. I use named pipes.
Peter

--


Interesting, you were the first one to say such a thing, everybody else said
remoting is the way to go. Can you elaborate a bit more on why do you think
remoting is dead?

Cheers

Padu


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can i pass arguments to a windows service
    ... You can use TCP/IP protocol, Remoting, Shared Memory, Named Pipes ... ... Easyest way is to use TCP/IP or remoting.. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: VB.NET Remoting Programming Challenge
    ... these posts hoping for some good ideas and a useful discussion. ... No joy. ... I've tried a few non-.net things, and I've found named pipes and WM_COPYDATA ... Remoting is much more elegant then dcom... ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Single instance app communication
    ... I have implemented a remoting hook to do exactly this, ... I'd /highly/ recommend WCF; ... being far clearer and cleaner, it is trivial to use named pipes ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: pass arguments to existing instance
    ... to pass the startup arguments to the existing instance. ... Socket class, remoting, etc.) and possibly named pipes are the most likely candidates. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Windows service design question
    ... Yes, you can use remoting for this, but you are not ... named pipes etc to create a communication channel between both UI and ... I think I may be able to make a design change so NO communication will be required between the UI and the service - other than the UI being able to stop/start/pause the service. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)