Re: why?



These numbers are important when talking to the taller upper management. You
are an engineer or someone with a computer science degree that has years of
experience, understanding what code is or isnt. Whereas, most of these guys,
hold an undergraduate degree in history and get into Investment Banking
because of their height. Talking about merits or demerits of Java vs .NET at
a very advanced level will either put them to sleep or make the Java team,
which talks at a even basic level as in length or size of code, only more
successful.

These CEOs, CFOs can easily relate to physical labor, size of the Framework
than to nerdier arguements as usability, ulility, ease of use, etc.

So, understanding my position, as you have been in one, or currently are in
one, an MVP, as you, must be quick at helping me out, as you know, quite well
that us, computer programmers have a different mindset than them.

Devan


"Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" wrote:

I'm curious as to what the number of people and development time have to
do with making this decision. After all, those people aren't the ones that
are doing anything, the finished product is.

As for saying "stabler Solaris", I think that is a debatable point.

Why not give what your project is going to consist of, and we can tell
you the pros and cons of using .NET for that project?

After all, that's what matters in the end. With all due respect, I feel
the metrics that you are trying to base this on should have no effect on
this decision. A framework could have one million methods vs another
framework with .5 million methods, but that doesn't mean it's better. You
have to take a look at what the framework offers for what you are doing, and
make the decision based on that.

--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Devan" <Devan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BF516579-EFCF-4748-A062-13F757643B12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Does anyone at Microsoft know the number of classes, namespaces and
functions
in .NET? Microsoft must have spent a lot of time in development. Do the
same
people know how many employees, departments, and time, it took for them to
get here?

I work for a financial firm that is going to start a new project on .NET
or
Java. They are looking for a solid arguement with a few numbers. Java is
currently preferred as it is Unix-based and runs on stabler Solaris.
Microsoft Windows XP server and .NET line of products are to be considered
as
competing solutions. If a microsoft employee or even an MVP, can give a
few
answers, with brag rights, detailing the .NET solution with numbers, years
of
labor, etc, it would be a strong reason to go for Microsoft.

Messages from other posters also appreciated!



.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: why?
    ... are an engineer or someone with a computer science degree that has years ... Talking about merits or demerits of Java vs .NET ... A framework could have one million methods vs another ... Microsoft must have spent a lot of time in development. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: What Borland should stop wasting their time on
    ... The framework has a lot of promise, but I think Microsoft was far too ambitious releasing far too many assemblies much too quickly. ... As a result design suffered, but to provide backward compatibility, Microsoft could not simply redesign the whole library and deprecate the old one. ... C/C++ programmers are on a different league as .NET. ... This concept is pioneered by Delphi and Java. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: C# is a proprietary programming language ??
    ... I dont believe Microsoft would be legally able to charge for the Framework ... Oracle/ Java initiative would love to be in that ... >> Example, rpg language. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Rekompilieren von VB6 und .NET
    ... Portalen die Jobangebote Java vs. ... ungünstiger für .NET aus. ... Schon interessanter und durchaus innovativ ist der Ansatz, über das Framework in beliebigen Sprachen, und das obendrein auch noch fast hundertprozentig interoperabel, entwickeln zu können. ... Sun hat sich in der Vergangenheit auch nicht sonderlich berechenbarer als Microsoft gezeigt. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.vb)
  • Re: porting from C++Builder
    ... the java was growing and, obviously, microsoft initially tried to ... that crowds of developers would rather stay and develop windows applications. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)