Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Martin Carpella <martin.carpella@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:59:10 +0200
Otis Mukinfus <phony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
After thinking this over, I do see one advantage to this. It would certainly
make conversion of java code to C# code easier. I suspect that is the real
reason behind the proposal. Along with making it easier for VB and Java
programmers to avoid learning type safe programming.
The "real" reason for proposing this is the introduction of anonymous
types which are required by LINQ (the integrated query language), which
you could not refer to otherwise as anonymous types obviously do not
have a name.
Best regards,
Martin
.
- References:
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Demetri
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Otis Mukinfus
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Rune Huseby
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- From: Otis Mukinfus
- Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- Prev by Date: Re: shouldn't if (this!=null) generate a warning?
- Next by Date: Re: Convert Twips to pixel
- Previous by thread: Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- Next by thread: Re: C# 3.0 Proposals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|