Re: multiple inheritance

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

Shawnk <Shawnk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you think this (valiant but flawed) effort is indicative of;

1. Inherent Jitter architecture flaw/weakness
2. Inherent MSIL architecture flaw/weakness
3. Inherent Multilple Inheritance problem with Von Nueman (turing tape)
engines

I think it's the normal problem of trying to make a square peg fit in a
round hole. The framework has its own idioms, and Eiffel wants to
bypass those idioms.

Without *some* idioms/rules, the CLR would be too general to be useful,
IMO. However, no set of idioms/rules can accommodate every way of
approaching things.

In short, I don't think it's a flaw in anything particularly - you have
to accept that no framework is going to be perfect for every
programming paradigm.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.