Re: Visual Studio 2005

Thanks a lot for your answer Jon, that cleared things up pretty well.

The .NET framework is better organised than Java in terms of the
standard library being broken up into separate units of functionality.
If you don't need anything to do with System.Messaging, why make either
the compiler or the runtime load that assembly?

I see your point. Does the Java compiler and runtime have to load the
hole standard library (rt.jar) everytime you compile and run a java
program? If this is the case, it doesn't seem optimal. I always thought
that Java only loaded the packages specified in the import statements.

Mads Peter

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Visual Studio 2005
    ... the compiler or the runtime load that assembly? ... Does the Java compiler and runtime have to load the ... are available and where within the jar file. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • using java from within ada - AONIX
    ... What I have done has rewritten some functionality in java and I ... the existing ada code. ... compiled the ada binding under the JavaVM-V7.2.1 compiler.. ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Why doesnt C# allow incremental compilation like Java?
    ... VS provides "standard" functionality. ... I find it a problem - at least compared with using Eclipse in Java. ... incremental compiler that it encourages you to save (and therefore ... compiler which makes life trickier though. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Cpp Considered Harmful
    ... >> programming language, the compiler, the IDE, the libraries, etc. ... source file, the implementation shall locate the declaration, (and ... to name one of the defining source files on the command line that initiates ... The counterpart to this in Java is accomplished using the following: ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: wie Array für statische Methoden
    ... > auf gar keinen Fall Java empfehlen;) ... Ich hab mal mit virtuellen Methoden auf einem Microkontroller experimentiert und bin zu dem Schluss gekommen: ... > Es ist ja gerade der Vorteil bei Java einen Compiler ... > Dinge zu optimieren, ...
    (de.comp.lang.java)