Re: Visual Studio 2005
- From: "Mads Peter Nymand" <madspeter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Mar 2006 11:34:57 -0800
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Maybe the command prompt compiler is set to include the full C# 2.0
Class Library the same way, that the Java command line compiler is set
to include the full java API class library.
It raises a new question though:
In the command prompt and in the Java IDEs I have used, the whole API
class library of the SDK is included by default. Why isn't it so in VS.
Why do you have such a limited set of references in a C# project in VS?
In the top of a file, you are declaring which namespaces to use. That
makes sense, because you have to define, which namespaces the classes
you are using, are belonging to. In my opinion, it does not make sense,
that you have to define new references (add refernces) at project
level, when you are using namespaces, that is part of the standard C#
library. That's just extra work for no reason. Can anybody give me a
reason why it is so - better stucture? faster execution? - something
Mads Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visual Studio 2005
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: Visual Studio 2005
- References:
- Visual Studio 2005
- From: Mads Peter Nymand
- Visual Studio 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Identifying client that sent data to Asynchronous socket.
- Next by Date: Re: Threads very slow
- Previous by thread: Visual Studio 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Visual Studio 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
