Hey everyone, I need some advice concerning Interfaces and delegates.
I would like to define a delegate inside of an interface (I know a
delegate is a class but hear me out)
Here is a sample:
Interface A
Class B inherits Interface A
Program C creates an instance of Class B and needs to consume events
from Class B.
I would like for Class B to be required to implement the delegates via
Interface A. Is this possible? Is this proper? Can/Should I use an
abstract class for this? Is there a better way?
Re: Delegates VS interfaces - some confusion ... the reason that an interface with three methods is not relevant is ...implementor) having a direct access to all three methods? ...delegates) due to security reasons, ... giving us member level polymorphism?!... (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Re: Interfaces and Events ... you have the queue as the focus point. ...William Stacey [MVP]... Instead of using delegates and events, ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Re: Delegates VS interfaces - some confusion ... the reason that an interface with three methods is not relevant is that a three-method interface is different from the single-method characteristic of a delegate. ... That is, with a three-method interface, any code with a reference to an implementor of that interface has access to all three methods. ...wrapping delegates inside ‘CurrentDelegate’ property), ...private void MethodA()... (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
RE: Delegates and Event to replace with Interface? ...Regards... i can replace the interface with delegates and events as shown on my previous example. ... > int funcB();... (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
RE: Delegates and Event to replace with Interface? ... i can replace the interface with delegates ... > interface IChildA... > int funcB();... > After look into your article, is it possible to replace interfaces into delegates. ... (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
