Re: Nullable Types
- From: "Steven Livingstone" <connect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:32:48 -0000
FWIW, there was a discussion a while back where this was considered (at
least a part of VB and you'd have to assume C#).
http://blogs.msdn.com/vbteam/archive/2004/05/28/143813.aspx#159656
Seems MS considered it. So either i'm missing something and it's already
done, or they chose not to do it.
steven :: http://stevenR2.com
"Steven Livingstone" <connect@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23TLXZxaIGHA.964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I've just blogged some stuff on Nullable types in net 2.0.
> http://stevenr2.blogspot.com/2006/01/nullable-types-and-null-coalescing.html
>
> Question however as to why you can't simply get an implcit conversion from
> a .Net value type to to a Sql Server data type rather than having to use
> null cheked and DBNull.Value ?
>
> Does anyone have some explanation as to why this is so tricky as to be
> included?
>
> http://stevenR2.com
>
.
- References:
- Nullable Types
- From: Steven Livingstone
- Nullable Types
- Prev by Date: Re: Dynamically instantiate class and call function
- Next by Date: Re: Serializing Multiple Objects of a Class
- Previous by thread: Re: Nullable Types
- Next by thread: Re: Nullable Types
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
