Re: C# runtime version
- From: "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:07:31 -0500
marcus,
Well, yes. You say you use tools that are available only in .NET 1.1.
I don't understand why you use the dev environment for 2.0, especially a
tool that generates so much code for you.
Basically, I would take the code and try to compile it in the 1.1 ide.
If it works, great, but all in all, I think the amount of checking you would
have to do in order to get code developed in the 2.0 IDE to compile in 1.1
is excessive.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"marcus" <marcus7171@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134068205.798463.245880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You mean that it is a bad idea to append this info into the executable
> file?
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C# runtime version
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: C# runtime version
- References:
- C# runtime version
- From: marcus
- Re: C# runtime version
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: C# runtime version
- From: marcus
- C# runtime version
- Prev by Date: Re: Eclipse and .NET
- Next by Date: Re: Delete a Row in Excel Spread***
- Previous by thread: Re: C# runtime version
- Next by thread: Re: C# runtime version
- Index(es):