Re: C# runtime version
- From: "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:54:16 -0500
marcus,
From what I hear, you can do it, but at the same time, I don't think it
is a good idea. It would be unsupported, and a good number of the tools
would no longer work, since they rely on new classes in the framework, which
don't exist for .NET 1.1.
If you search the google for this group, there are a few posts on the
topic, with links to resources on how to do it.
Hope this helps.
--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"marcus" <marcus7171@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134067716.644075.147270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a C# application developed with .NET 2.0 tools to run
> with .NET 1.1. runtime. Is this possible? I have only used methods and
> properties compatible on .NET 1.1.
>
> Are there specific build options that I need to use?
>
> Are there samples on writing configure files that manage the runtime
> version checks? Is it possible to append this configuration file to the
> executable file instead of having it as a sidecar (side-by-side file)?
> Is it possible to have the compiler automatically generate the
> configuration file depending on the C# sources?
>
> Thanks for any help
> Regards
> Marcus
>
> P.S. I'm new to C# D.S.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C# runtime version
- From: marcus
- Re: C# runtime version
- References:
- C# runtime version
- From: marcus
- C# runtime version
- Prev by Date: C# runtime version
- Next by Date: Re: Strange Session Restart
- Previous by thread: C# runtime version
- Next by thread: Re: C# runtime version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading