Re: optimized code


"Mike" <vimakefile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Oj7acNp%23FHA.2424@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Is it still true that the managed C++ compiler will produce much better
> opimizations than the C# compiler, or have some of the more
> global/aggressive opimizations been rolled into the 2005 compiler?
>

Yes, the Managed C++ compiler should still be better. the C# compiler still
doesn't go very far as far as optimizations go, AFAIK anyway. They are left
to the JIT.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C++ and Java
    ... >ability of the C++ compiler to optimize code for the OS. ... A JIT can go one step further and optimize for the target processor as ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: optimized code
    ... >>> opimizations than the C# compiler, or have some of the more ... >> still doesn't go very far as far as optimizations go, ... > loop invariants are handled by the JIT not by the compiler fron-ends. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • misc: lang effort, performance
    ... I added a define that allowed me to enable/disable ref counting to see what ... a c implementation of the algo takes about 110ms (generic compiler options). ... I had started to consider the possibility of jit compilation. ... of course, thinking of it, some optimizations (those which I had originally ...
    (comp.lang.misc)
  • Re: interpreter vs. compiled
    ... there is a process that runs product instructions, ... the notion that JIT technology compiles code. ... my C implementation a compiler. ... new machine language for each one. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: any JIT compilers for Prolog?
    ... I know you need to take care of different platforms when doing JIT, ... into C and calling the C compiler at runtime is not my option. ... for a Java based Prolog like http://www.binnetcorp.com/Jinni ... that avoids Java objects and encodes everything as integers. ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)
Loading