Re: Amazing LINQ for .Net
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP] <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 06:36:01 +0100
Bruce Wood <brucewood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> Yes, I imagine that "var" _will_ become the usual way to declare local
> variables, not because it removes type checking, but just because you
> get the same thing with less typing.
No, you can't get the same thing. You can get the same binary output,
but you don't get the same level of readable code.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- References:
- Re: Amazing LINQ for .Net
- From: William Stacey [MVP]
- Re: Amazing LINQ for .Net
- Prev by Date: Re: running c# executable....
- Next by Date: Re: Checking if string
- Previous by thread: Re: Amazing LINQ for .Net
- Next by thread: Re: Amazing LINQ for .Net
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading