Re: performance
- From: Andrew <notes_at_shaw_dot_ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:55:59 -0700
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 19:28:21 +0200, Willy Denoyette [MVP] wrote:
> "Andrew" <notes_at_shaw_dot_ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:fwls0m8jc5l6$.1tqtg596p91zn.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On 2 Sep 2005 06:46:04 -0700, bjarne wrote:
>>
>>> I thought I was pretty clear about that: Yes the aim of C++ was to
>>
>> I have to say - I was kinda thinking - huh? How could he have been any
>> clearer?
>
> Maybe I'm not that smart as you are :-)
Actually, you seem to be very intelligent - I'm just not sure where you got
the idea he hadn't answered your question after he seemed to put it so
straight forward (to me..)
Cheers
- Andrew
.
- References:
- performance
- From: bjarne
- Re: performance
- From: Willy Denoyette [MVP]
- Re: performance
- From: bjarne
- Re: performance
- From: Willy Denoyette [MVP]
- Re: performance
- From: bjarne
- Re: performance
- From: Andrew
- Re: performance
- From: Willy Denoyette [MVP]
- performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is the compiler flagging this variable as unassigned?
- Next by Date: Re: Are reference type parameters passed as a copy of the original reference?
- Previous by thread: Re: performance
- Next by thread: Re: performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|