Re: Class problem

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

Well that is interesting. I was not paying that close attention (obviously).
So I guess you cannot view a class within a class. That seems to be a bit
limiting and it makes sense with what I am seeing on the appilcation.

The Assembly Class (part of the System.Reflection namespace) is not
recoginzing the foo member variable as a class.

thanks for the help,

lee franke



"Jeremy Williams" <jeremydwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23zwQiMAsFHA.3720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In your example, the first 'System' is the assembly, the second 'System'
> is the namespace, and the 'URI' is a class definition. This is easy to
> determine by selecting each node in the tree, and looking at the
> information displayed about that node. For the root 'System' node, you see
> this:
>
> ---------
> Assembly System
> C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\System.dl
> ---------
>
> When you select the 'System' node located under the root 'System' node,
> you see this:
> ---------
> Namespace System
> Member of: System
> ---------
>
> And when you select the URI node, you see this:
> ---------
> Public Class Uri
> Inherits System.MarshalByRefObject
> Member of: System
>
> Summary:
> Provides an object representation of a uniform resource identifier (URI)
> and easy access to the parts of the URI.
> ---------
>
> So you are not seeing classes within classes, you are seeing
> Assembly-to-Namespace-to-Class relationships.
>
> "Lee Franke" <lee.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:euK4qn$rFHA.1252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I added that code to the testing classes of foo and foo1. The class
>>library I am attempting to build has 23 classes (4 base classes with many
>>other classes being derived from them) with all sort of member variables
>>at each level.
>>
>> The foo1 and foo class appears in both the Class View and the Object
>> Browser. The foo class is still not be recognized as a class object. For
>> an example use the Object Browser to goto system.System and you will see
>> various class under it like "URI",
>>
>> thanks for all of the help,
>>
>> lee franke
>>
>> "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> in message news:efpmbX$rFHA.1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Lee,
>>>
>>> I compiled it as a class library, yes.
>>>
>>> You are talking about the property grid, not the object browser (the
>>> object browser is a very specific utility in VS.NET).
>>>
>>> To get your class to show the properties of the exposed objects, you
>>> want to adorn the classes that you want to be expanded with the
>>> TypeConverter attribute, indicating the type of the
>>> ExpandableObjectConverter, like so:
>>> [TypeConverter(typeof(ExpandableObjectConverter))]
>>> namespace name
>>> {
>>> public class foo
>>> {
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> namespace name
>>> {
>>> public class foo1
>>> {
>>> foo propf = new foo();
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course, it is meaningless in the above example, because you don't
>>> have any public properties exposing foo, and foo doesn't have any
>>> properties itself. Try this:
>>>
>>> namespace name
>>> {
>>> [TypeConverter(typeof(ExpandableObjectConverter))]
>>> public class foo
>>> {
>>> public int MyProp
>>> {
>>> get
>>> {
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> set
>>> {
>>>
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> namespace name
>>> {
>>> public class foo1
>>> {
>>> private foo propf = new foo();
>>>
>>> public foo Foo
>>> {
>>> get { return propf; }
>>> set { propf = value; }
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
>>> - mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Lee Franke" <lee.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:%23geHv6%23rFHA.3016@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Compiles fine on mine. Are you compiling it as a class library? (mmmm
>>>> maybe that is my problem)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I want a class that has a member property another class which
>>>> has its own public member properties.
>>>>
>>>> When you look at it thru an object browser you see foo1 with a little
>>>> '+' sign with foo under it with another little '+' sign.
>>>>
>>>> Make sense?
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> lee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote in message news:eIQo$2%23rFHA.1256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Lee,
>>>>>
>>>>> The code, as posted, does not compile fine. You get a "Expected
>>>>> class, delegate, enum, interface, or struct" error on the line:
>>>>>
>>>>> public foo propf;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the desired results, what are you trying to do?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
>>>>> - mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> "Lee Franke" <lee.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:eZ7myx%23rFHA.1172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> It compiles fine. But leave that out for a second, how would you get
>>>>>> the desired results then?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lee franke
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]" <mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote in message news:OIyVEv%23rFHA.2596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Lee,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know what you are expecting to see. This code doesn't
>>>>>>> compile. The "public foo propf" is outside of the foo1 definition,
>>>>>>> and should throw a compiler error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
>>>>>>> - mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> namespace name
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> public class foo1
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> foo propf = new foo();
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> public foo propf;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Lee Franke" <lee.franke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:%23BQuoi%23rFHA.3884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>I can't seem to figure this one out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is my class structure
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> namespace name
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> public class foo
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> namespace name
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> public class foo1
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> foo propf = new foo();
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> public foo propf;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the object browser 'propf' does not show up as a class. It just
>>>>>>>> appears just as a member variable of foo1. In the object browser if
>>>>>>>> you look at the system.System object you see several objects that
>>>>>>>> are members variables and you can expand them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What am I missing?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lee franke
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Class problem
    ... Public Class Uri ... > The foo1 and foo class appears in both the Class View and the Object ... > an example use the Object Browser to goto system.System and you will see ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Class problem
    ... You are talking about the property grid, not the object browser (the ... namespace name ... have any public properties exposing foo, and foo doesn't have any properties ... > Compiles fine on mine. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: macros
    ... (:method ((foo foo) ... (baz baz)) ... I don't see any namespace related anything in that. ... manually managed dispatch tables and plenty of other migraine-inducers ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: pre-PEP: Suite-Based Keywords - syntax proposal
    ... > def foo(): ... suite supplies a transient namespace where foo happens to ... Bengt Richter ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Followup question on defining methods dynamically
    ... I'm doing something that's not at all object-oriented, and simply want to ensure that a bunch of methods don't leak out into the global namespace. ... The eval would define a 'foo' object in Test, so there would exist a function Test.foo. ... The include statement in Run would cause all names in Test to be imported into Run, resulting in a 'foo' entry in the Run hashmap; ... Finally, code run within a module always has access to the module's namespace for variable lookup, so the call on 'foo' within Run would find 'Run.foo' and execute it. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)