Re: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- From: "Nick Malik [Microsoft]" <nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:36:36 -0700
"42" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d7940eaab5f6356989cc4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <L_2dnZ2dnZ31OlKdnZ2dnVuokt6dnZ2dRVn-zp2dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> Hi Dave
>>
>> This is with me trying my level best to come up with an example where I
>> would actually need to know that an item is a Monitor, but I can't figure
>> one.
>
> I found it amusing that you couldn't think of a scenario where we'd need
> to know what the parts actually are, when its self evident. You need to
> know what the parts of a computer are when you are modelling a computer.
I'm not sure if I should be insulted by your insinuation or just amused at
the fact that you seem to have completely missed the point.
> E.g. After the user selects the components, and we've composed them into
> a computer object, with motherboard, cpu, case, etc... the next logical
> step will be to try and boot the thing up. ;)
If you want to simulate a computer, you have little or no need to model the
parts. The BEHAVIOR of the parts, yes, but not the parts themselves,
because the parts are not pertinent to the BEHAVIOR of a computer.
Anyway, I'm signing off for a week. Either you get it or you don't. Good
luck.
--
--- Nick Malik [Microsoft]
MCSD, CFPS, Certified Scrummaster
http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this forum are my own, and not
representative of my employer.
I do not answer questions on behalf of my employer. I'm just a
programmer helping programmers.
--
.
- References:
- Re: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Double not a class but struct
- Next by Date: Re: Why is C# 500% slower than C++ on Nested Loops ???
- Previous by thread: Re: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- Next by thread: RE: Best Practices -- Naming Convention Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|