Re: Should I explicitly initialize all member variables?

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Jeff Louie <jeff_louie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:57:28 -0700

Javamman.. The following two lines of code are NOT equivalent in C#.

>MyClass m = null; // redundant
MyClass m; // better?<

The second line simply creates an unitialized variable. It does not
default to null.

http://www.geocities.com/Jeff_Louie/OOP/oop5.htm

Regards,
Jeff

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I explicitly initialize all member variables?
  - From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]

References:
- Should I explicitly initialize all member variables?
  - From: Javaman59

Prev by Date: Re: Writing a "Command Prompt"
Next by Date: Windows Services
Previous by thread: RE: Should I explicitly initialize all member variables?
Next by thread: Re: Should I explicitly initialize all member variables?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Converting
... references have type and objects have class. ... Regards, ... Jeff ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Re: How do you guys handle errors from class libraries?
... I would throw an exception in the call. ... Regards, ... Jeff ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Re: Is it possible to hide class methods when the class has not been properly instantiated?
... can provide an isValidmethod or flag. ... Regards, ... Jeff ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Re: Falklands boomer
... But there again that could refer to a Vulcan!! ... Regards ... Jeff ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.military.naval)
Re: Time formatting and date suffixes
... "general utility functions" folder:) ... Regards, ... Jeff ... Prev by Date: ...
(comp.lang.python)