Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: "Dan Bass" <Not Listed>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:15:19 +0100
just posted a reply to Nicholas, then read this and you've said the same
thing in a fraction of the space. I've gotta learn to do that!
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d36d763bedb5c8b98c41c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> kids_pro <kids_pro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I absolutely agree to what Jon said.
>> With the new feature of IDE I want to write and app. target 1.1.
>> However the 2.0 changed give me some hard time (I need to learn new
>> classes)
>> :(
>
> If it were just a case of learning new classes (which you don't *have*
> to, just to use .NET 2.0) I wouldn't have a problem. It's a deployment
> issue more than anything - not only do you have to redistribute the
> framework to people who already have 1.1 (and potentially an earlier
> version of your product - rather than patching a single DLL, you'd have
> to give them a whole new set of DLLs and the new framework), but you
> also have to worry about large organisations who take a long time to
> "certify" the use of any framework within their organisations. They may
> have done .NET 1.1 by now, but that doesn't mean they'll automatically
> say that .NET 2.0 is okay...
>
> --
> Jon Skeet - <skeet@xxxxxxxxx>
> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
> If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
.
- References:
- Changes in 2005.
- From: Mark Broadbent
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: Dan Bass
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: kids_pro
- Re: Changes in 2005.
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Changes in 2005.
- Prev by Date: Re: Changes in 2005.
- Next by Date: Re: Excel Control
- Previous by thread: Re: Changes in 2005.
- Next by thread: Re: Changes in 2005.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|