Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: "Bruce Wood" <brucewood@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jun 2005 10:02:15 -0700
I haven't worked with VS 2005, but I've seen lots of demos. It's much,
much better than VS 2003. However, I'd hardly consider that as a good
reason to switch. Generics, partial classes, improved data access,
nullable types, ... all of these are far better reasons to switch. My
company will be adopting VS 2005 as soon as we've decided that it's
stable and reliable.
I'm so sure about this because I regularly run across situations in
..NET 1.1 in which I have to do ugly things that would be downright
elegant in .NET 2.0. Mostly this has to do with generics and partial
classes, but the other features would really help me, as well. I can't
wait to adopt .NET 2.0 and rewrite some of the ungainly code I have
underlying my system. :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: wozza
- Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: Mark Broadbent
- Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- References:
- What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: yaron
- Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: Moty Michaely
- Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- From: Mark Broadbent
- What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Speech SDK 5.1
- Next by Date: RE: Enums and Text Descriptions
- Previous by thread: Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- Next by thread: Re: What are the advantages of .NET 2.0 over NET 1.1 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|