Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: "Michael Voss" <michaelREMOVE.CAPSvoss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 15:12:19 +0200
Steven Wolf wrote:
[...snip...]
> without taking care about the network-time, namepiping etc.,
ms-sql/indexes
> never get such results as the hashtable do.. i saw better results on
> PostgreSQL...
[...snip...]
> i am curious if sql server 2005 will conquer the speed as the hashtable
do...
[...snip...]
Don't expect any database to be even remotely as fast as a "simple" memory
access...
We are using Oracle 9 /10 as a database and even loading 1,000,000 rows of
data from file into memory and searching for a particular object (including
object creation) is faster than a simple query (first execution) against the
index of 1,000,000 rows in the database.
.
- References:
- Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: Steven Wolf
- Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: Dmytro Lapshyn [MVP]
- Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: Steven Wolf
- Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Prev by Date: Re: how to debug
- Next by Date: dataGrid - Unselecting a cell
- Previous by thread: Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Next by thread: Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|