Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: "Dmytro Lapshyn [MVP]" <x-code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:50:55 +0300
Hi Steven,
There's nothing surprising. The Hashtable is (well, let's assume so) in the RAM, and its searching algorithm is optimized for performance. The SQL Server keeps indexes on disk, so even if the algorithm is similar, loading the indexes from disk takes time (as well as transmitting the result set over the network or over a named pipe).
-- Sincerely, Dmytro Lapshyn [Visual Developer - Visual C# MVP]
"Steven Wolf" <apoc69@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5167D5D4-DDA4-4B9A-8419-8066DBE78C47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi guys,
can a hashtable be faster than a sql server??
i made my own O/R mapping with an "entity cache" (caching all mapped
objects). So, when i get some data from my sql server, i map that data to an
entity-object and i leave a copy of it in the entity cache.
the entity cache is a simple hashtable, which stores as key:
the ID of the entity ( the same id as the primary key of the sql-table ) and
the entity type.. and as value: the object itself.
so, when i access the cache, i say: Contact contact = EntityCache.Get( 5109,
typeof( Contact ) )
i just made some tests and i filled the cache with 1 mio. contacts. the result: searching the hashtable for one value, costs mostly ~0.000.007 sec! (nanoseconds).. thats amazing!! my sql server can never reach such values! my dev. machine is just an amd 2 ghz with 1 gb ram.
of course i can search in the cache only by id, but it is the same way as
the sql server would search for an index, isn'it? i thought about, to setup
an extra caching-server... just read a big sql-table and store everything in
the entity-cache..(updating/inserting/deleting or searching by other values
is another topic).
i cant believe it!
steven.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: Steven Wolf
- Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- References:
- Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- From: Steven Wolf
- Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Prev by Date: Re: access a textbox value from another form
- Next by Date: CSV reader
- Previous by thread: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Next by thread: Re: Hashtable faster than SQL ?!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|