Re: C# very optimisation
- From: "Lebesgue" <nospam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:25:16 +0200
When talking about image processing, a VERY big performance bonus can be
gained when using unmanaged (unsafe) code and pointers. I remember an
article saying unmanaged image processing can be up to 28 times faster than
managed.
Here it is
http://tinyurl.com/3sux8
"Ennixo" <ennixo@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:428af2d6$0$814$8fcfb975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jon Skeet [C# MVP] a écrit :
> > Furthermore, micro-optimisations tend to come at the expense of the
> > code being as readable as it can be, which IMO should be the primary
> > goal.
>
> generaly yes, but this is for image processing, so i need to optimize as
> much as i can, even if the code becomes 10x bigger and unreadable
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C# very optimisation
- From: Ennixo
- Re: C# very optimisation
- References:
- C# very optimisation
- From: Ennixo
- Re: C# very optimisation
- From: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
- Re: C# very optimisation
- From: Ennixo
- C# very optimisation
- Prev by Date: Re: Navigate a DataSet/DataTable
- Next by Date: Re: Why can't overloads take into account the return type.
- Previous by thread: Re: C# very optimisation
- Next by thread: Re: C# very optimisation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|