Re: void parameter argument
- From: "Frans Bouma [C# MVP]" <perseus.usenetNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:43:29 +0200
Dan wrote:
Is it just me, or is the removal of support for the word "void" in a parameter list extremely annoying? Some of us have been programming for years putting "void function_name (void)" - and it really doesn't feel nice having to miss it out. Is there any reason for them removing this? I don't suppose there's a pragma or something to stop the compiler barking about it is there?
But you have to type less, so what's the big deal? ;). Just get used to () means (nothing) or (void) or (nada) and you're done :)
FB
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get LLBLGen Pro, productive O/R mapping for .NET: http://www.llblgen.com My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma Microsoft MVP (C#) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: void parameter argument
- From: Dan
- Re: void parameter argument
- From: Dan
- Re: void parameter argument
- References:
- void parameter argument
- From: Dan
- void parameter argument
- Prev by Date: Re: void parameter argument
- Next by Date: method to bind ListBox, DropDownList, RadioButtonList
- Previous by thread: Re: void parameter argument
- Next by thread: Re: void parameter argument
- Index(es):