Re: C++ --> C#

Todd,

No, there is not. The reason for this is that C++ as a language has
many features which do not translate directly to C#. Also, the environments
are different (unless you are using JUST managed extensions for C++), and
there is no direct mapping from one to another.

Hope this helps.


--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<ToddT> wrote in message news:ag1551543c6pq3cbi9ru2i72mh6rs445qr@xxxxxxxxxx
> is there a free utility somewhere that will convert vc++ to c#? thx in
> advance.
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: R6 Counterproposal
    ... Fexprs, environments, and fully general ... But if you are suggesting purely optional features, ... ability to reason about the code. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
    ... I'm not knocking VB.NET - but the only reason it has more "new" features ... retranslated back into another .NET language. ... assembly that acts as a translation layer. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: The status of C
    ... > programming discipline, but good discipline combined with helpful features ... >> Is C still the language of choice for serious programming? ... > often not the primary reason, why a particular tool is or isn't right ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Processes in UNIX
    ... > Not comparing PLs but probably you can tell me the reason why still C ... > which aren't required for systems programming). ... C++ does have many more features. ... IMO; as a language, it's absolutely huge; indeed, it's ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: The status of C
    ... >Since C is my language of choice for almost any kind of application, ... Working without these features might be a good way to _learn_ better ... often not the primary reason, why a particular tool is or isn't right ... introduces a bug doing it... ...
    (comp.lang.c)