Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256
From: Ravi Singh (UCSD) (ravisingh11_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: BLiTZWiNG: "Re: FileCopy to a shared folder"
- Previous message: Swe: "Referencing Word Document through C#"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 14:45:06 -0800
Thank you for replying .
7a29dc9b52b3e44eef25e0441853324c97489f5e626fc1aa97e4ede646b50a45 ---
thats with the FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256 Christophes implementation
0fae56d5786cade88b348cf55a9e4a217406ff5359e517cddf9fea2bb686ea6f on
.NET C# after converting it to a HEX string.
is C# not FIPS-180-2 compliant or is there some other problem.
Ravi Singh.
- Next message: BLiTZWiNG: "Re: FileCopy to a shared folder"
- Previous message: Swe: "Referencing Word Document through C#"
- In reply to: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Next in thread: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Reply: Jon Skeet [C# MVP]: "Re: SHA 256 .NET vs FIPS-180-2 compliant SHA-256"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
