Re: Fully qualified names
From: Nick Malik [Microsoft] (nickmalik_at_hotmail.nospam.com)
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Joakim Karlsson: "Re: create an event handler for control array in C#"
- Previous message: Marc Jennings: "[Conditional] question"
- In reply to: fc2: "Re: Fully qualified names"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:41:45 -0800
OK, I hate to recommend this, but...
Can you change your namespace, in your app, so that the word "System" is not
part of it?
I guess my thinking is this: we work around "reserved words" all the time.
You ran into one in a place you didn't expect, but that doesn't mean you
can't work around it in the same way. I'm not making excuses... perhaps my
perspective is just different.
--
--- Nick Malik [Microsoft]
MCSD, CFPS, Certified Scrummaster
http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this forum are my own, and not
representative of my employer.
I do not answer questions on behalf of my employer. I'm just a
programmer helping programmers.
--
"fc2" <fc2@tytte.dk> wrote in message
news:1105352804.328846.64670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Ok, but still I ought to always be able to use the fully qualified name
> (to explicitly state my intentions).
>
> The situation is further complicated by the fact the MS VS .NET
> generates some classes behind my back (for accessing resources and for
> settings). The generated code uses fully qualified names to system
> libraries and this code won't compile either (unless i change it
> manually which is a no-no) since it also tries to find system classes
> inside Foo (probably because they are part of the same compilation
> unit).
>
>
> /fc2
>
- Next message: Joakim Karlsson: "Re: create an event handler for control array in C#"
- Previous message: Marc Jennings: "[Conditional] question"
- In reply to: fc2: "Re: Fully qualified names"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
